Download Agent-Centered Morality: An Aristotelian Alternative to by George W. Harris PDF

By George W. Harris

What varieties of people will we aspire to be, and the way do our aspirations healthy with our rules of rationality? In Agent-Centered Morality, George Harris argues that almost all people aspire to a definite type of integrity: we want to be respectful of and sympathetic to others, and to be loving mom and dad, acquaintances, and participants of our groups. opposed to a triumphing Kantian consensus, Harris bargains an Aristotelian view of the issues awarded through functional cause, difficulties of integrating all our matters right into a coherent, significant lifestyles in a fashion that preserves our integrity. the duty of fixing those difficulties is "the integration test."Systematically addressing the paintings of significant Kantian thinkers, Harris exhibits that even the main complicated modern models of the Kantian view fail to combine the entire values that correspond to what we name an ethical lifestyles. via demonstrating how the that means of lifestyles and sensible cause are internally similar, he constructs from Aristotle's proposal a conceptual scheme that effectively integrates the entire features that make a lifestyles significant, with out jeopardizing where of any. Harris's elucidation of this procedure is a huge contribution to debates on human enterprise, useful cause, and morality.

Show description

Read Online or Download Agent-Centered Morality: An Aristotelian Alternative to Kantian Internalism PDF

Similar ethics & morality books

The Rational and the Moral Order: The Social Roots of Reason and Morality (Paul Carus Lectures)

This publication propounds a thought of cause and a conception of morality, complex by way of Professor Baier in his APA presidential handle and his Carus Lectures. Our ownership of cause and our skill to cause rely on our having grown up in a rational order: a social order which engages within the company of cause and, via socialisation, passes on from one iteration to the following the information of the acknowledged basic ideas of reasoning, the power to use them to specific situations, and the tools for extra development.

Deontology, Responsibility, And Equality

Can deontological ethical constraints be justified? while, if ever, are we morally liable for what we do? How is the suitable of equality most sensible configured? Deontology, accountability and Equality offers with chosen points of those 3 large questions that loom huge in ethical and political philosophy.

The Complete Book of Greed: The Strange and Amazing History of Human Excess

A fanciful reference documenting humankind's endless fascination with, and lust for, cash deals a historic examine of human avarice and conspicuous intake, from the pyramids of the pharaohs to Imelda Marco's notorious shoe assortment. 35,000 first printing.

Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics

Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics has been unjustly ignored compared to its extra recognized counterpart the Nicomachean Ethics. this is often largely due to the fact until eventually lately no entire translation of the paintings has been on hand. however the Eudemian Ethics is a masterpiece in its personal correct, supplying precious insights into Aristotle's rules on advantage, happiness and the great existence.

Extra info for Agent-Centered Morality: An Aristotelian Alternative to Kantian Internalism

Example text

It also means that implementing the test requires very careful and detailed work. Showing that a conception of rational agency is plausible in some contexts is not sufficient for rational acceptance of that conception. This is why the analysis in parts 2 through 4 is so detailed. As in science, there is no shortcut to testing a ― 51 ― theory, and, as in art, glossed blemishes eventually penetrate the veneer designed to conceal them. Philosophy involves hard, detailed work. 6. The result, then, is that I accept Allison's requirement for an argument for the conception of rational agency employed here and explicated in general in the remainder of part 1.

Necessarily, if P ought to do x, P can do x. 3. Therefore, P can do x. It is the fact that the first premise is necessarily true on the Kantian view that prevents its falsification by showing that the consequent of (2) is false. This argument can then be employed to show that reason motivates by add[9] . Korsgaard, "Skepticism about Practical Reason," 23 n. 17. , 23. [11] . See Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason , trans. Lewis White Beck (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), 5:30–31; Marcia Baron, Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), 44–45; Allison, Kant's Theory of Freedom , 230–49.

2. Necessarily, if P ought to do x, P can do x. 3. Therefore, P can do x. It is the fact that the first premise is necessarily true on the Kantian view that prevents its falsification by showing that the consequent of (2) is false. This argument can then be employed to show that reason motivates by add[9] . Korsgaard, "Skepticism about Practical Reason," 23 n. 17. , 23. [11] . See Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason , trans. Lewis White Beck (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), 5:30–31; Marcia Baron, Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), 44–45; Allison, Kant's Theory of Freedom , 230–49.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.31 of 5 – based on 10 votes